Guide to Cloud, Automation & Platform as Code
Cloud computing and automation now sit at the center of how most businesses build and run software. Platform as Code (PaC) pushes the same idea further: application deployments and infrastructure configurations are defined and managed entirely through code.
None of these approaches comes free. Each brings its own set of problems, and some of them bite hard if you find out late. This article walks through the risks that come with cloud computing and automation, then the ones specific to PaC implementations, so you can adopt these tools with your eyes open.
Businesses lean harder on data-driven decisions every year, and that means processing and analyzing volumes of data that only cloud-based infrastructure can realistically handle. The cloud also buys you agility: resources scale up when market demand spikes and back down when it passes. Automation compounds the effect by cutting out much of the human error that manual work invites.
Cloud migration is where most organisations start. It is not a one-time project; the environment needs ongoing monitoring, maintenance and optimisation, which is why many businesses hand that work to specialists rather than carry it themselves.
Where automation earns its keep is in removing manual steps from repetitive processes.
| Examples | Description |
|---|---|
| Azure Bicep | A service provided by Microsoft that allows organizations to automate their business processes and operations, reducing the need for manual involvement and improving efficiency. |
| Terraform | A tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently. Terraform can manage existing and popular service providers as well as custom in-house solutions. |
| Ansible | An open-source tool that automates software provisioning, configuration management, and application-deployment. |
| Node-RED | An open-source programming tool by IBM that allows you to wire together APIs and software services for the purposes of automation. |
| Octopus | An automated deployment server designed to simplify deployment of ASP.NET applications, Java applications, NodeJS application and custom scripts. |
The catch is security and compliance. None of the gains above matter much if the environment is exposed. Vulnerability assessments, penetration testing and ongoing monitoring are not optional extras; they are the baseline work that keeps a business protected from cyber threats as more of its operations become digitised.
PaC takes a different shape than the broader cloud and automation story. When every element of the platform is managed as code, you get consistency across teams, version control on your infrastructure, and an easier time scaling complicated environments.
Security is the part that deserves the most attention. Terraform state files hold sensitive data unencrypted by default, and moving that data between environments can run afoul of audit requirements or your own data handling policies. Both problems are easy to overlook until an auditor finds them for you.
The fixes are not exotic: encrypt sensitive data at rest, decrypt it only when needed, and lock down access to the storage accounts and any other systems that house it.
Terraform's state file, the tfstate, is the concrete case worth understanding. It records infrastructure and configuration data, including sensitive details. Terraform offers no built-in encryption for these files, so the data sits unencrypted, which raises the risk of unauthorized access and policy violations.
Transferring sensitive data between environments carries its own exposure. The transfer itself can intersect with audit requirements and data handling policies, so every move adds risk.
Solutions for Safer PaC Implementations
To get the benefits of Platform as Code (PaC) without the security downside, you need deliberate planning and the right security tooling. These are the measures we recommend:
-
Tfstate File Encryption: A tfstate file usually contains sensitive information, so encrypt it. Terraform will not do this for you, which means building a custom solution: a DevOps pipeline step that encrypts and decrypts the data as needed, or a third-party tool that secures the tfstate files directly. Either path costs some time and resources up front, and both beat leaving state data in the clear.
-
Enhanced Access Control & Monitoring: Encryption does not help much if access controls are weak; securely stored data can still be breached. Put strong, role-based Access Control Measures (RBAC) in place to limit who can reach the data at all. Then watch what happens: continuous monitoring of user actions and network activity is what lets you catch suspicious behaviour or a breach early instead of months later.
-
Segregation of Sensitive Data: Store and manage sensitive information separately from less-sensitive details. That one separation shrinks your exposure whenever data has to move.
-
Data Policy Compliance: Write strict policies for how sensitive data is stored, handled and accessed, and make them specific: who has what level of access to which types of data, and under what circumstances that access is permitted. Vague policies protect nobody.
-
Encrypted Storage: Keeping sensitive information encrypted at rest adds another layer of defense against breaches, and against infractions of privacy regulations like GDPR or HIPAA. Which storage service you pick comes down to cost, ease of use, and compatibility with your existing systems. All of them buy you the same core protection: if someone does gain unauthorized access, they do not get free rein over your data.
None of these measures does the whole job on its own. Together they form a layered defense, and that is what lets a system run securely while still taking full advantage of a tool like PaC.
Each storage provider secures Terraform state files a little differently, and most bring side benefits such as version control or direct integration with services you may already run. Which one fits will depend on the specific needs and constraints of your project or organization.
| Storage Provider | Security Features | Other Advantages |
|---|---|---|
| AWS S3 | Server-side encryption through AWS Key Management Services. | Version control, state locking, and secure sharing of state files among multiple users. |
| HashiCorp Vault | Dynamic secrets generation, secure secret storage, and data encryption. | Centralized management of secrets and sensitive data; integrates with Terraform Cloud for enhanced security. |
| Azure Blob Storage | Data is encrypted at rest and in transit. Azure also offers advanced threat protection. | Version control, state locking, and secure sharing of state files among multiple users; integrates with Azure DevOps for workflow management. |
| Google Cloud Storage | Data encryption at rest and in transit. Offers Identity and Access Management (IAM) for controlling access to resources. | Versioning support, object-level access controls, and secure sharing of state files among multiple users. |
| IBM Cloud Object Storage | Server-side encryption with customer-provided or system-managed keys. Supports IAM for access control. | Durable storage with built-in fault tolerance, flexible storage class tiers. |
Security in digital transformation work does not hold still. As the technology changes, so do the risks, which is why regular audits and threat assessment reports matter: they keep your picture of the threats current rather than months out of date.
The benefits of cloud computing, automation and PaC are real. But move carefully on the security front before betting the business on them. Know the risks going in, pick solutions that actually fit your environment, and the rest of the adoption gets much easier.
Automation Technology
We've been helping live entertainment brands scale cloud environments to deliver unforgettable experiences for over a decade
Talk to an Expert
Grow and transform your brand by embracing technology and reimagining the fan experience.